How To Write Critique Part

How To Write A Critical Part In Critique Essay

When writing a critical part, you’ll need to do two key things: summarizing and analyzing a text. The critical analysis can be of a novel, a chapter, or an article in a journal. To provide a fair and realistic assessment of the selected text, you are generally asked to read the selected text in-depth and other relevant texts too. Though critical parts can have specific standards for assessment depending on the discipline, they typically have a similar structure. You will test your essay directions about formatting, discipline-specific standards and other conditions to write the analysis correctly. For longer essays, headings are generally optional and can be helpful to the reader. Let us talk about the structure of a critique essay as defined by an essay writing service.


An introduction’s duration is typically one paragraph or two paragraphs long depending upon your essay. Have some opening sentences announcing the author(s) and the title, and briefly clarify the subject of the text. Present the text’s intent, and summarize the main finding or statement. Conclude the introduction with a short comment about your interpretation of the text. This can be a positive or negative appraisal or a mixed answer as is normally the case.


Present a rundown of the key points along with a few instances. One of the key components of critical review writing is the summarization of a text to be reviewed. To write a good summary, you should: present the arguments correctly in the original text, ensure that the key issue is addressed by the text attempts to answer the important points, including the facts used by the text to support the claim, and its conclusion ensures that the explanation is clear and understandable.


This part should be a reasoned debate and assessment of the text’s strengths, shortcomings and notable features. Even good reviews provide other outlets to help the judgment (remember to reference). You can choose how the critique is sequenced. Below are several examples to start:

Mark the most important to the least important conclusions about the text. When the feedback is more positive than negative, in this case, first show the negative and then positive. When the feedback is more negative than positive than first show the positive points and last the negative.

When there are both strengths and disadvantages for every criterion that you use, you need to determine what your decision is overall. You could start by stating what’s good about the concept, and then concede and explain how it’s somehow restricted. While this example shows a mixed judgment, you’re probably more negative than positive overall.

You can answer any requirement you want in a paragraph in long reviews for both negative and positive ones. Include a paragraph of positive points and another of negative for very short critical feedback (one sentence or even less), where the responses would be briefer. Recommendations can also be included on how to develop the text in terms of concepts, analysis approach; hypotheses or methods used can also be included in the critic’s section.

Summarizing and paraphrasing are important competencies for academic writing and particularly critical analysis. Summarizing involves reducing a text to its key points and its most relevant ideas. Your overview period for a critical review will be only around one-quarter to one-third of the entire critical review. Check the text the best way to summarize it is to:

  • Look for information from the introduction, conclusion, title, and headings that can be deduced. Locate the sentences on the subject and highlight key points as you read.
  • Read the text again and make separate notes about the key points. There’s no need to provide examples and proof at this point. Typically they are used in the criticism, selectively.
  • The paraphrase means you put it in your own words. Paraphrasing provides an alternative to using direct quotes in your explanation (and the criticism) and can be an effective way to convey your explanation comments to general audience. Study your review notes. The best way to paraphrase is to rewrite them in your own words and full sentences

Conclusion and References:

Typically that is a very short part. Restore your overall view of the file. Give recommendations in brief. If required, you should provide any additional qualification or clarification of your judgment which will help to make the critique sound rational and logical. After you’ve found the flaws of your text, take a few hours to study your work and make the necessary changes until your text is flawless.